AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Foobar analog vu meter12/27/2023 When the errors stop and I restart foobar, even if I restart foobar without waiting for the errors to stop, the images are usually displayed correctly.īasically, all of the images are correctly displayed, until I click on some item, and a forced re-scan is triggered, which then causes the error. The thing is, the art is already cached properly and displays correctly in the seconds before it disappears and gives me those errors. When the error happens, the theme seems to force some re-scan of cached images. I can also say that combinations of albums or tracks where some have art and others don't doesn't appear to be the source of the issue. If I close foobar and go to the same item that gave me errors, it may or may not happen again. In an hour of testing, this is the only type of error I've seen. When the error appears, I get a lot of error message popups at once, the most I've received is about 150 error popups on a single 30 track album. As for the length attribute, I have seen values of 1, 2, 3, 6, 8 and 15. I have seen the first value ranging from anywhere between 1 and 38, and I presume that it's tied to the number of tracks. The main difference is that the numbers change. :) With this new file I get a variation of the following displayed:ĪlbumIndex undefined 2 :3 Stack I have tested this a bunch of times in an attempt to get as much information as possible, so here goes. I've already got a fully formed cache with saved images on my HDD, but I regenerated it just in case, which didn't resolve the issue.Įrror: Spider Monkey Panel v1.2.2-beta+67d2c599 (GraphicBrowser v1.2.2b22 by Ottodix) Basically, the library browser panel crashes sometimes when opening some category from the left side menu, regardless of the active sort method (I've tried folder structure, artist, and genre). It seems to appear randomly on different media, and it seems linked to the album art cache generation, though I can't be sure. Purely electronic devices may emulate the response of the needle they are VU-meters in as much as they respect the standard.Hello, it's me again! :) I encountered this error while browsing through the library, but this time I'll keep it short, I promise! In effect, the scale ranges from −20 VU to +3 VU, with −3 VU right in the middle. The meter was designed not to measure the signal, but to let users aim the signal level to a target level of 0 VU (sometimes labelled 100%), so it is not important that the device is non-linear and imprecise for low levels. "0 VU is equal to +4 dBu, or 1.228 volts RMS, a power of about 2.5 milliwatts when applied across a 600-ohm load. So, the green units on the pic are the actual dB units? Is that what you prefer to see as opposed to the sort of mysterious (to me) VU units? FWIW from the Wikipedia: Now if you can get through THAT gobbly-gook explanation my hat is off to you, haha. It's hard to know what I'm really looking at as I'm so used to dB units, so I was eye-ballling the differences with the VU meter and "Enhanced Spectrum" Foobar plugin's peak readings and your Dejavu meter ( mod) and at -15db meter preamp it seemed to be around 3 units off from the dB peaks, but as those units apparently differ around 4 units (from what I was able to find out) that may be OK. Hiccup: I wasn't familiar with the concept of VU units vs dB so I had to do some reading on that.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |